although i'm not about to concede that his foreign policy will trump bush-cheney in terms of atrocity. that jury is still out.
His foreign policy is claiming hundreds (if not thousands) of lives each week at a rate far greater than the last two years of the Bush Presidency. While Iraq is again spinning out of control this jump in body count is largely due to Obama's genocidal escalation* in Afghanistan and Pakistan, something that helped create half a million refugees (such a humanitarian calamity will result in an increase in infant mortality, violence, sickness, starvation and other miseries) in northwestern Pakistan.
My mentioning the possibility that Obama's atrocities might eclipse those of Bush-Cheney was intended only to highlight the potential for disaster. I had no intention to rank one presidency over the other - I see no point in such self-indulgences (which are necessarily clouded by political persuasion). This is what is happening now, and Obama is at the helm, a man who used his rhetorical flair to encourage the misconception that he was "anti-war" and markedly different from Bush and Cheney.
He isn't. Iraq is running the same course as it was when they left office (though it is again descending into bloody summer carnage) and he has started a 'new' war in Pakistan, one that has potential consequences
far graver than Bush's messy removal of an unpopular dictator.
* "genocidal" because it seems that the policy is to wipe out the Pashtun people. Much of the "Taliban" forces that they are killing are nothing more than tribesman who have been hired on as cannon fodder. Some provinces are reporting that more seventy percent of "Taliban fighters" are not ideologically aligned with the Taliban at all. Most are unemployed and impoverished farmers and laborers who are paid four dollars per attack.