Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
May 24, 2012, 06:56:58 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Caw's Not Dead!
207151
Posts in
3368
Topics by
42
Members
Latest Member:
Full Blown Possession
Crappity
|
Casa de Crappity
|
Main Room
|
Where the Old Topics Live
|
2008
|
May 2008
| Topic:
Mom v. Movie House
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
Author
Topic: Mom v. Movie House (Read 2550 times)
matthew
war all the time
King and Caroline
Karma: 360
Offline
Posts: 15012
fighting forever against everything
Mom v. Movie House
«
on:
May 21, 2008, 06:59:24 AM »
How about something more positive than what I wrote last night?
President Obama
By Gwynne Dyer
On the assumption that President Barack Obama survives for a full
four-year term -- for it is generally assumed that, as the first
African-American president, he will face a higher than average risk of
assassination -- what changes will he bring to the United States and the
world? It is remarkably difficult to say, for no president since Lyndon
Johnson has come to office with so few commitments to specific policies.
Oh, all right then, since Gerald Ford -- but neither of those men was
actually elected to the presidency.
It is now a near certainty that Obama will be the next US
president. The media will try to maintain the illusion of a race for the
Democratic nomination until Senator Hillary Clinton finally retires from
the race (which may not be until the convention in August), because it
helps to fill the awful gap between the 24-hour news cycle and the actual
amount of news available. But as leading independent pollster John Zogby
put it on Wednesday, "To all intents and purposes the race for the
Democratic nomination is over."
After last Tuesday's North Carolina and Indiana primaries, there is
no mathematical chance for Hillary Clinton to win a majority of the
delegates to the Democratic convention, and the flow of money for her
campaign is already drying up. It is unimaginable that the so-called
"super-delegates" (senior Democratic party figures who get an automatic
vote at the convention) would reject the verdict of the primaries by opting
for Clinton, so the case is closed.
Having seen off the Hard Man of the Democratic party, Obama must
now defeat the Hard Man of the Republican party in November. (Clinton
promised to "obliterate" Iran if it attacks Israel; Senator John McCain has
proposed threatening North Korea with "extinction.") But it will be hard
for Obama to lose while the United States is plunging into a deep recession
and the Republican candidate is still shackled to the Bush administration's
war in Iraq.
About the only thing that would give McCain a chance of winning is
a big terrorist attack on the United States that drives voters into the
arms of those who promise security through endless war. Al-Qaeda would be
happy to oblige, for the presence of American troops in Iraq is its best
recruiting tool and McCain has said he would be willing to see US troops
stay there for a hundred years. But al-Qaeda in its current state probably
lacks the resources for such an ambitious project.
So Obama gets the presidency -- and then what? A longish honeymoon,
in all probability, while Americans congratulate themselves on having
transcended the racist legacy of their past, which means that Obama will
have a better chance than most new presidents to change the way things
work. Moreover, he will probably be able to depend on Democratic majorities
in both houses of Congress.
On the other hand, he will inherit a ravaged economy and a lost
war, so he has little room for expensive domestic reforms or dramatic
initiatives abroad. Getting American troops out of Iraq will take several
years and use up a lot of his political credit at home, even if it does
wonders for America's reputation in the rest of the world. And he will not
be able to cut bloated US military spending at the same time, so there is
no early "peace bonus" waiting for him on the fiscal front.
Indeed, there is little that any American president can do about a
recession in the short run except to wait it out. Like Bill Clinton before
him, Obama will ultimately have the job of repairing the huge budget
deficit bequeathed to him by his Republican predecessor, but the only step
he can take in the short run is to roll back the huge Bush tax cuts for the
rich. So what else can the Democrats do in the meantime that doesn't cost
too much?
Reversing the Bush administration's assault on the constitutional
rights of American citizens and the human rights of non-Americans --
closing Guantanamo, ending official support for torture, and restoring the
civil liberties that were destroyed by the Patriot Act and subsequent
legislation -- are high-priority tasks that are practically cost-free. And
creating a genuine national health-care programme would not cost that much
in the early years, provided that you break the stranglehold of the
insurance companies at the same time.
Barack Obama has said very little about this during his campaign
(and Hillary Clinton, haunted by her failure to reform health care in her
husband's first term as president, has said even less). But the fact that
about one-sixth of the American population has no access to high-quality
medical care is an astonishing failure in a rich democracy, and Obama has
travelled enough to see it for the scandal that it is.
Obama may be unconvincing as a gun-loving, truck-driving,
fast-food-addicted son of toil, but he is the candidate of the American
poor even if many of the white poor don't recognise him as such. No single
reform would do so much to improve the lives of poor Americans as a fully
comprehensive health-care system that is free at the point of delivery. He
has given us few clues about his intentions, but my money says that that
will be his first priority in domestic affairs. He might even succeed.
«
Last Edit: May 21, 2008, 08:36:16 AM by Gocatgo
»
Logged
i must have been bit by a spider, when i was very small. because now i am grown up i spend five days a week going up the fucking wall. i must have been fenced-in to a long straight road when i was nine or ten because now i am grown up i spend five days a week going around the fucking bend...
matthew
war all the time
King and Caroline
Karma: 360
Offline
Posts: 15012
fighting forever against everything
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #1 on:
May 21, 2008, 07:42:40 AM »
Actress Natalie Portman hates a sex scene she filmed for movie 'Hotel Chevalier' because critics and reviewers focused on her nudity and not the film itself.
The star recorded the scene last year, and admits she regrets stripping off on the big screen as her picture ended up on pornographic websites.
She says: "It's not that I regret the film, but it really depressed me that half of every review on the film was about the nudity. It made me think I shouldn't have done it.
"I'm not prudish about nudity. I think it's beautiful in films, and sex is such a big part of life. My issue is that I feel it takes something away from what you're doing when
the focus is put on the wrong thing. My picture ended up on porn sites, and that's the dilemma."
(ignores rest of what she said focusing only on "sex is such a big part of life" line)
Logged
i must have been bit by a spider, when i was very small. because now i am grown up i spend five days a week going up the fucking wall. i must have been fenced-in to a long straight road when i was nine or ten because now i am grown up i spend five days a week going around the fucking bend...
Tripp
King and Caroline
Karma: 627
Offline
Posts: 23778
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #2 on:
May 21, 2008, 08:11:20 AM »
What the fuck did she think everyone was going to focus on?
Logged
I don't use the word don't.
bebopbalogna
Queen of Second Guessing
Karma: 463
Offline
Posts: 13174
i know what fucking "dharma" means.
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #3 on:
May 21, 2008, 08:50:57 AM »
i was focusing on my grip. but then again, i only saw it on the porn sites.
Logged
giminamee.
Bizarro
Time Lord
King Shit and the Golden Boys
King and Caroline
Karma: 535
Online
Posts: 18169
wibbly wobbly timey wimey
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #4 on:
May 21, 2008, 09:26:08 AM »
I moved Crappitystock and Alcoholica to the main category. Just trying to keep Geek isles from being overloaded.
Logged
Friday was the crucifixion/Saturday, cremation under glass/The resurrection was on Sunday/No, correction, make it Monday/'Cause Monday's when they come to take the trash
matthew
war all the time
King and Caroline
Karma: 360
Offline
Posts: 15012
fighting forever against everything
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #5 on:
May 21, 2008, 12:23:49 PM »
So...I watched Iron Man, Charlie Wilson's War, The Orphanage, There Shall Be Blood, and Southland Tales over the long weekend.
I found
Iron Man
to be absolutely dreadful and never want to watch another Marvel Studios film again as long as I live.
Charlie Wilson's War
was surprisingly watchable and factual for a Hollywood film. It is actually manages to be a solid, basic primer on the subject of how the U.S. involved itself in the radical Islamists they now find themselves at war with. My only complaints would be that it is suggested that the CIA did not foresee the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, when the truth of the matter is the they were intimately involved in deliberately precipitating it. The film opens in the 1980s and I wondered if this was out of PARTISAN concerns, pinning the blame entirely on the Reagan Era, despite the fact that Wilson was a Texas Democrat. The truth of the matter is that soft noble pacifist Democrat Jimmy Carter was the one who began the program, at the behest of king shit Zbigniew Brzezinski. A good close to the film would have been Clinton, in defiance of the embargo, flying C-130s full of weapons and mujahideen fighters from Afghanistan to Bosnia to fight the Serbs and smash Yugoslavia to pieces for the benefit of NATO control of Eastern Europe. The immediate predecessor to the 9-11 attacks, the so-called
Bojinka
plot was the work of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who had also worked to arm and fund the Islamists fighting in Bosnia. "Bojinka" is a Serbian word for explosion. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is not Serbian. The London Bombings were also connected to Bosnia. None of this is in the film, but I do understand that they were only following Wilson's tale. Anyway, the film moved along at a popcorn movie clip and yet had its facts relatively straight.
El Orfanato
is exactly what you would expect from a film produced by Guillermo del Toro. In many ways it is a retread of territory covered by
The Devil's Backbone
, but I have no urge to slam it for this - ghost stories are ghost stories and this one is well told.
There Shall Be Blood
was very strong in almost every way except the story by Sinclair (which I have no read) was either not well adapted or simply did not lend itself to film. Like
No Country for Old Men
it attempts to part with convention and sorta fumbles the ball in the last ten minutes. If it were not for the fact that I realized I was not emotionally involved in the story unfolding in front of me I would give it eight or nine stars.
Southland Tales
.Uh...pass?
Logged
i must have been bit by a spider, when i was very small. because now i am grown up i spend five days a week going up the fucking wall. i must have been fenced-in to a long straight road when i was nine or ten because now i am grown up i spend five days a week going around the fucking bend...
captqitn
Happy Jack
Karma: 451
Offline
Posts: 10481
droppin explosive vagina panties all over th'place
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #6 on:
May 21, 2008, 12:34:23 PM »
I want to pull a freaky friday scenario with this fellah. Let him sadly moan and whimper under flourescent lighting for a while.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St_4vYCPax4[/youtube]
Logged
Weak for bitch drinks.
captqitn
Happy Jack
Karma: 451
Offline
Posts: 10481
droppin explosive vagina panties all over th'place
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #7 on:
May 21, 2008, 01:06:50 PM »
I"M ON DA SWIDE AGAIN!!!
Logged
Weak for bitch drinks.
matthew
war all the time
King and Caroline
Karma: 360
Offline
Posts: 15012
fighting forever against everything
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #8 on:
May 21, 2008, 01:10:36 PM »
Quote from: capt qitn on May 21, 2008, 12:34:23 PM
I want to pull a freaky friday scenario with this fellah. Let him sadly moan and whimper under flourescent lighting for a while.
Yeah, what gives with this weather and this (apparent) cold? I have an ear infection and the weather is rainy and windy and cold. Feels like fall. I worked 26hrs over the long weekend and then four more hours and since then the weather has been shitty and I have been half-deaf.
(didn't I post the waterslide dog before? not a complaint, I just want to remember if I did)
Logged
i must have been bit by a spider, when i was very small. because now i am grown up i spend five days a week going up the fucking wall. i must have been fenced-in to a long straight road when i was nine or ten because now i am grown up i spend five days a week going around the fucking bend...
matthew
war all the time
King and Caroline
Karma: 360
Offline
Posts: 15012
fighting forever against everything
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #9 on:
May 21, 2008, 01:11:09 PM »
Um...where is everybody?
Logged
i must have been bit by a spider, when i was very small. because now i am grown up i spend five days a week going up the fucking wall. i must have been fenced-in to a long straight road when i was nine or ten because now i am grown up i spend five days a week going around the fucking bend...
captqitn
Happy Jack
Karma: 451
Offline
Posts: 10481
droppin explosive vagina panties all over th'place
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #10 on:
May 21, 2008, 01:17:26 PM »
woof woof brooowowwrrrrrr woof
Logged
Weak for bitch drinks.
full blown possession
Guest
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #11 on:
May 21, 2008, 01:22:27 PM »
WHERE AM I, I, I?))))
we can do this, with or without your snide ass attitude
you made a mess now impress me
im lost in all the hallways and cant find anyone, information overload
Logged
full blown possession
Guest
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #12 on:
May 21, 2008, 01:28:43 PM »
she moves and I taste her
yeah, yeah, I taste her
mmmh yeah
Logged
full blown possession
Guest
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #13 on:
May 21, 2008, 02:54:30 PM »
'til the U.S. Army crashed in to me
Logged
Doctor Rock
Search And Annoy
King and Caroline
Karma: 474
Offline
Posts: 23232
Nulla Dies Sine Linea
Re: Mom v. Movie House
«
Reply #14 on:
May 21, 2008, 03:01:20 PM »
Boy... Slow day for the cleaners, eh?
Logged
«Etre bête, égoïste et avoir une bonne santé, voilà les trois conditions voulues pour être heureux. Mais si la première vous manque, tout est perdu.»
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
Crappity
|
Casa de Crappity
|
Main Room
|
Where the Old Topics Live
|
2008
|
May 2008
| Topic:
Mom v. Movie House
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Casa de Crappity
-----------------------------
=> Main Room
===> Where the Old Topics Live
=====> 2009
=======> July 2009
=======> June 2009
=======> May 2009
=======> April 2009
=======> March 2009
=======> February 2009
=======> January 2009
=====> 2008
=======> December 2008
=======> November 2008
=======> October 2008
=======> September 2008
=======> August 2008
=======> July 2008
=======> June 2008
=======> May 2008
=======> April 2008
=======> March 2008
=======> February 2008
=======> January 2008
=====> Pre-2008
=======> 2003
=========> December 2003
=========> November 2003
=========> October 2003
=========> September 2003
=======> 2004
=========> January 2004
=======> 2005
=======> July 2007
=======> August 2007
=======> September 2007
=======> October 2007
===> FAQ
===> Crappitystock
===> Wonky Wankers
===> Jock Itch
===> Assorted Geekery
===> Trailer Park
===> Doc Bloc
===> Crappitymax
===> Interstitials
Loading...